This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

In partnership with

A PSYCHOLOGY BOARD REFUSED TO ENDORSE BRAINWASHING

The English Word Brainwashing Dates From 1950

Many People Assume Psychologists Proved It Exists

Researchers Did Not Settle Whether It Exists

Courts And Journals Call It Thought Reform

Its Supporters Say The Techniques Work Without Physical Force

An American Psychological Association Board Rejected A Report In 1987

The Harm Itself Was Not The Question

What Follows Is What Was Actually Tested

THIS NEWSLETTER IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. NOTHING IN THIS CONTENT CONSTITUTES MEDICAL, PSYCHOLOGICAL, OR PROFESSIONAL ADVICE. ALWAYS CONSULT A QUALIFIED HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL BEFORE MAKING ANY HEALTH RELATED DECISIONS.

A Quick Shoutout To Our Sponsor: TOP TRADE TOOLS
Here's What They Have For You 📊

👇🏻

Buy On Blue, Sell On Red..

Buy on Blue. Sell on Red. This 2-time award-winning hedge fund algorithm from Mark Helweg captured a 6,566.5-point Nasdaq move, worth over $131,000 per futures contract. Now a fresh Blue Dot BUY signal is live on a little-known ticker. Get your FREE live entry directly on the chart today.

OKAY BACK FROM THE REVIEW 🗂️

👇🏻

THE WORD AND THE REPORT 🧾

Edward Hunter Published The Word In The Miami Daily News In 1950

He Interviewed Former Prisoners In Hong Kong As A Journalist

The Term Came From A Chinese Phrase Written Xi Nao

Xi Nao Translates Literally As Wash Brain

Hunter Presented It As A Method Of Political Control

Psychologists Later Tried To Test Whether Such A Method Exists

The American Psychological Association Convened A Task Force In 1983

Its Scope Was Deceptive And Indirect Methods Of Persuasion

Margaret Singer Chaired The Group

The Task Force Worked For Roughly Three Years

Members Filed A Final Report In November 1986

The Board Of Social And Ethical Responsibility Reviewed It

That Board Replied To The Task Force On 11 May 1987

Its Memo Said The Board Was Unable To Accept The Report

Scientific Rigor Was What The Board Found Missing

The Same Memo Called It Not Evenhanded

Two Board Members And Two Outside Experts Had Read It

Task Force Members Were Told Not To Imply APA Support

One Paragraph Addressed The Underlying Question Directly

The Board Wrote That It Lacked Enough Information To Take A Position

That Rejection Did Not Dismiss The Complaints

What The Board Declined To Endorse Was One Explanation

A Quick Shoutout To Our Sponsor: CBDISTILLERY
Here's What They Have For You 🍃

👇🏻

The CBD Brand that Actually Does What It Says

CBD is having a moment and CBD brands are everywhere right now. But with so many options, it can be tough to know what to look for – and which brands actually follow through on their claims.

That’s where CBDistillery sets itself apart. For the past decade, all of CBDistillery's products have been made with non-GMO, US-grown industrial hemp and with 100% clean ingredients – no corn syrup or artificial colors, flavors, preservatives or sweeteners.

They frequently introduce new and innovative products formulated to meet a variety of wellness needs and customer preferences. And every single batch of CBDistillery’s gummies, oil tinctures, topicals and softgels are tested by an independent, accredited lab to make sure what’s in the package matches what’s on the label.

Right now, CBDistillery is offering our readers a special deal: save 50% on orders of $75 or more with code AUGUST50!

WHAT UNITED STATES COURTS DID

United States Courts Took Up The Same Question Soon After

Expert Witnesses Wanted To Testify About Coercive Persuasion

Federal Courts Screened Scientific Evidence Under The Frye Standard

Frye Required General Acceptance In The Relevant Field

A Federal Appeals Court Rejected Singer's Theory In 1988

The Clearest Ruling Came Two Years Later In California

Steven Fishman Faced Mail Fraud Charges And Claimed Insanity

His Defense Planned To Call Margaret Singer And Richard Ofshe

Judge Lowell Jensen Ruled On 13 April 1990

He Found The Thought Reform Thesis Lacked General Acceptance

Testimony On Coercive Persuasion Was Excluded From The Trial

The Supreme Court Replaced Frye With Daubert In 1993

Daubert Told Federal Judges To Assess Method Rather Than Popularity

Forcible Deprogramming Was Prosecuted Separately

Ted Patrick Removed Group Members For Families Who Hired Him

A Fullerton Court Convicted Him Of False Imprisonment In 1975

He Was Convicted Of Kidnapping Roberta McElfish In 1980

A California Appeal Court Upheld That Conviction In 1981

Civil Suits Followed Those Criminal Ones

Jason Scott Sued Over A Failed Deprogramming In Washington State

A Jury Found For Him In September 1995

The Cult Awareness Network Owed 1 Million Dollars In Punitive Damages

That Judgment Forced The Network Into Bankruptcy

Another Quick Shoutout To Our Sponsor: TOP TRADE TOOLS
Here's What They Have For You ⚡️

👇🏻

Stop Guessing Direction.. Just Buy on Blue.

A single Blue Dot BUY signal tracked a massive 6,566.5-point move in Nasdaq futures—more than $131,000 per full contract. Now Mark Helweg’s 2-time award-winning hedge fund algorithm has identified another little-known ticker. See the live signal and get your FREE entry plotted directly on the chart before it develops.

HOW PEOPLE ACTUALLY LEFT ❓

Researchers Were Measuring Departures While The Courts Argued

Stuart Wright Published A Monograph On Defection In 1987

The Society For The Scientific Study Of Religion Issued It

He Had Already Studied Voluntary Leavers Three Years Earlier

Those Leavers Rarely Used Brainwashing Language

James Lewis And David Bromley Compared Exits In 1987

They Published It In The Journal For The Scientific Study Of Religion

Former Members Were Split By How They Had Left

Some Departed Willingly With No Counseling At All

Others Accepted Voluntary Exit Counseling After Leaving

A Third Group Had Been Deprogrammed Against Their Will

Reported Symptoms Were Lowest In The First Group

The Deprogrammed Group Reported Far More Symptoms Than The Rest

Exit Method Mattered More Than The Group Itself

A 2000 Paper In Clinical Psychology Review Assessed This Work

Aronoff And Two Colleagues Found Distress In A Substantial Minority

They Also Listed Problems With How The Studies Were Done

Those Problems Temper What The Literature Can Show

The Studies Found Distress And Not A Loss Of Choice

The End

Don’t Forget To Sub If YØU Haven’t Already.

IF YOU DID SUB, CHANCES ARE IM IN SPAM, MOVE/DRAG MY EMAIL TO MAIN FOLDER AND MARK IT AS SAFE.

ITS NOT THAT HARD.

IF

A GOLD FISH CAN COMPLETE THIS SIMPLE TASK.

WHY CAN’T YOU?

EXACTLY…

BE SMART 🧠